Step 4. Record your findings and implement them. Step 5. Review your assessment and update if necessary. Source: indgpdf. structure with responsibilities pdf. 3 – Risk assessments Email: [email protected] Telephone: Planning 5 Steps to Risk Assessments pdf.
|Published (Last):||26 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||8.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The ;ubns studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. Consider for example a small manufacturing process where Team A take raw material and prepare it for initial fabrication by Team B.
Good Practice and Pitfalls in Risk Assessment. High quality risk assessments are usually achieved quite easily for individual pieces of equipment or self contained work areas. Common Pitfalls of Risk Assessment and How to Improve Pkbns case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments.
This paper gives a brief overview of where responsibility for occupational health and safety lies in the UK, and how risk should be managed through risk assessment.
HSL undertook a Review indg136 Risk Assessment Practice in [ 12 ] and identified these and further common failings that are listed below: They hsf a duty to demonstrate that they have taken action to ensure all risk is reduced SFAIRP and must have documentary evidence, for example a risk assessment or safety case, to prove that they manage the risks their activities create.
These are outlined in Fig. All three parties, the Designer, the Contract Company and the Public Park Authority, had legal responsibility for the health and safety of invg163 staff who would operate the structure and the public who would visit the park. The group did not have the structural engineering expertise to cover the stability of the structure and did not require evidence from the Designer or the Contract Company that the appropriate load calculations had been undertaken and verified, and that the structure would be appropriately secured to ensure stability.
The Risk Matrix questions the probability of certain levels of harm.
HSE successfully prosecuted all parties, the Designer, the Contract Company and the Public Park Authority, for failing to protect the health and safety of both workers and the public. A suitable and sufficient risk idng163 called a Safety Case for large, high hazard plant was not completed following the modifications.
Dividing the time spent on the risk assessment ui several individuals – this approach to risk estimation usually means that risks at interfaces between plant, people or processes are missed. Of employees to ensure that they do not endanger themselves or anyone else who may be affected by their work. The paper concludes with an analysis of the common failings of risk assessments and key actions for improvement. All three of the parties listed above had a responsibility to ensure the structure was safe but not one of them did so.
Using “reasonably practicable” allows HSE to set goals for organisations, rather than being pre scriptive. Of anyone who designs, manufactures or supplies an article or substance for use at work to ensure that it is safe. The wind conditions were not abnormal for the UK.
Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice
Here, the risk consequence indf163 of harm has its probability derived from a number of factors. Find articles by Karen Russ. The corroded pipe is shown in Fig.
This accident was completely avoidable. The Designer failed to provide a full giv speci fication for the structure which would have included load calculations in various wind conditions. Carrying out a detailed Quantitative Risk Assessment without first considering whether any relevant good practice was applicable, or when relevant good practice exists. The investigation identified that fuel leaked out of a coupling during the in-flight refuelling.
Making decisions on the basis of individual risk estimates when cumulative risk to society is the appropriate measure. The short guide to Health and Safety Regulation in the UK [ she ] provides a summary of the Health and Safety at Work Act and states ‘The main require ment on employers is to carry out a risk assessment.
In this case, the employer forgot Step 5 of HSE’s Five Step Risk Assessment Process, that is ‘to continually review and update the risk assessment at suitable puvns intervals’.
Depending upon the level of harm and the probability, the risk is labelled as High, Medium or Low. Risk graph [ 10 ].
Useful Health and Safety Links
Open in a separate window. In addition, only 22 tethers were located after the incident. What harm could be caused to plant, people employees and the public and the environ ment land, water, air, plants, animals. Legal Responsibilities under the Health and Safety at Work Act The Health and Safety at Work Act places responsibility not only on employers but also on designers, manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that articles and substances are safe for use so far as is reasonably practicable, and on every employee while at work to take reasonable care of him or herself, and of any other person who may be affected by his or her actions.
Dreamspace was a large inflatable structure inside which members of the public could walk around to experience a dream-like world of light and sound.