Site Overlay


Fred Neulander. The opinion only reaffirms the jury’s sound belief in a guilty verdict in this case.” Carol Neulander was beaten to death by two. A LOOK BACK: Rabbi Fred Neulander murder trial .. The rabbi, now 73, is serving a life sentence for murder with no release date in sight. Fred Neulander, 61, showed no emotion as the forewoman of the jury of seven . In Neulander’s case, only one aggravating factor exists: the fact that he paid.

Author: Arashilabar Tojashicage
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 25 February 2006
Pages: 61
PDF File Size: 4.98 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.50 Mb
ISBN: 980-4-25965-520-3
Downloads: 84454
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazushura

Testimony is expected to dwell around infidelity and disreputable characters allegedly hired to be hit men. The details provided by Beardsley, the photographs of the tire marks, and the information regarding Jenoff’s contacts with Bell’s family would have, in our view, had a significant potential to confuse the jury by focusing on Jenoff’s guilt in the murder of Ccase Bell, rather than on the true nature of the inquiry, the reason for his cooperation with the State.

In weighing their testimony, therefore, you may consider whether either of them has a special interest in the outcome of the case, and whether such testimony was influenced by the hope or expectation of any favorable treatment or reward, or by any feelings of revenge or reprisal.

Numbwr explained that, although he subsequently learned that his name had come up in another homicide investigation and that he voluntarily talked to the police regarding that investigation, he had no concerns that he would be charged with that homicide. Three days earlier, a defense investigator interviewed Beardsley in jail.

The Court held that the co-defendant’s guilty plea was not admissible as substantive evidence of the defendant’s guilt but was admissible for the limited purpose of affecting the co-defendant’s credibility. We note, however, that when an incarcerated witness is expected to testify on a defendant’s behalf that defendant should notify the trial court and the State as soon as practicable, so that those parties may make suitable arrangements.

Fred Neulander – Wikipedia

Ten to fifteen days before the murder, defendant was playing racquetball with his friend, Myron “Peppy” Levin. They saw her husband and son in the house around that time. The evidence of the other crime must be clear and convincing; and 4. After Carol finished her telephone conversation, Jenoff followed her into the living room.

Fred Neulander

To be admissible as res gestae the “things done” must be so closely connected in both time and substance as to be part of the happening. Again, because defendant did not object to a reading of these questions, which were answered without objection during the first trial, we must consider neeulander issue based on the plain error standard. Jenoff himself was a dubious feed, and the defense spent hours cross-examining Jenoff on the fact that he had lied about CIA ties and work as an FBI informant.


Specifically, defendant challenges the following questions and answers:. While Fred worked to become a successful rabbi, Carol played the good wife and loving mother.

The lack of a limiting instruction did not have a clear capacity to produce an unjust result nor did it affect the outcome of the trial. Serial killers, stalkers and domestic homicides. They came into this house to kill. Police learned soon after the murder that Fred Neulander was having an affair with Elaine Soncini, then a Philadelphia radio personality. During the charge conference, defense counsel inquired, “I’m curious, is there any ‘false in one, false in all’ language in the [charge].

They borrowed ladders from a Cherry Hill firetruck to check the roof for clues. His son, North Carolina physician Matthew Neulander, testified that his parents had a terrible fight two nights before the killing and Fred Neulander told her in the son’s presence, “It’s over.

The judge concluded that the neulandrr scope of Jenoff’s cross-examination was limited to whether Jenoff 1 “ever told Mr. The [S]tate violated Brady v. Apparently, the state thought there was enough evidence to establish a conspiracy case against Neulander, even if his co-conspirators were unknown.

On November 22,the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the death penalty. Neulander had also argued court error on the issue of double or triple layer “hearsay” evidence, i. Jenoff and Daniels left the home. Her instructions on both, neither of which is challenged on appeal, were comprehensive and appropriate, and achieved the proper balance.

If it were to end there, I would agree with you neulandeg that would not be a trial within a trial, and would not consume very much time, and it would not have a risk of misleading the jury. We have many plans and enthusiasm to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really need your help neulanderr this.

Neulnder time we were all preparing to wait and [defendant] said that he would stay and accompany [Soncini] back to the synagogue.

Fred Neulander | Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers

And I loved her. Witnesses said they saw him at the synagogue the night of the murder, but said it was very unusual for him to be there on a Tuesday night.

It had been empaneled in Camden County. Frred was freed on bail. The variations in Jenoff’s testimony from his earlier statement to the police essentially included Carol’s reaction to Jenoff’s initial blow with the lead pipe, the number of times he asked to use the bathroom, the timing of when he looked for the purse in relation to Daniels’ entry into the house, the removal of Carol’s purse, the name of the Israeli Consulate, the source numbber the lead pipe, Dase referral to Carol’s murder as his “Entebbe,” and defendant’s statement to him at Carol’s Shiva service that everything was alright because Carol was dead.


Boone’s testimony corroborated Artwell’s account, which was significantly different from that given by the arresting officers. Reviewing the file, the defense ascertained that two days after Jenoff’s arrest for the Neulander murder, the Bell family, upon learning of Jenoff’s arrest, contacted the police.

On appeal, defendant argues. After Carol finished her conversation, Jenoff followed her into the living room. Daniels claimed that he struck the victim twice with a pipe. At the sentencing hearing, he addressed the jury. Even if Neulanver did testify in this manner, defendant failed to show that trial or appellate counsel erred in addressing this issue.

We have some very substantial leads to follow up,” Borden neulnder at a mid-morning press conference Wednesday at the Cherry Hill municipal building. He asked to use the bathroom so he could look fted the house for the purse. Jenoff found the burgundy purse, and went back to the living room to make sure Carol was dead.

Soncini would go on to testify at trial that when her previous husband, Philadelphia radio personality Ken Garland died, she turned to Neulander for comfort.

Keeny related Jenoff’s purported statements that the killing of Carol Neulander was a “botched burglary,” that “the kid snapped,” and that defendant had “no clue. Defendant did not testify at trial. During his sentencing, Daniels blamed his actions the night of the murder on a drug problem, which his lawyer, Craig Mitnick, said his client had suffered since age In his testimony, Jenoff denied telling Beardsley that he was involved in an unrelated homicide.

One week later, on November 1, Carol was again talking to Rebecca when she advised Rebecca that someone was at the front door. The Murphy panel concluded that, because the judge enhanced the co-defendants’ credibility and the only evidence against defendant was presented by his co-defendants, a two-fold instruction adding the prohibition against using a guilty plea as substantive evidence of the defendant’s guilt was necessary.

So for those reasons, I find that there would be a substantial risk of confusing the jury and of undue consumption of time. He merely reminded the panel of their responsibility, the intent of the legislature when reinstating the death penalty inand he again asked them to let their conscience, individually and collectively, guide them.