1 feb. Eminescu-Interzis-Radu-Mihai-Crisan_carte Uploaded by. Iuliana Banu · Arheologia Interzisa-Istoria Ascunsa a Omenirii. Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu · Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu · Arheologia Interzisă Doc. Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu · Gentleman Nnn. Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu. stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars. Arheologia interzisa. Istoria ascunsa a rasei umane (Paperback). Published January by MAR.
|Published (Last):||3 July 2014|
|PDF File Size:||15.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.34 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
Combining this with other mainstream histories of science A A fascinating alternative view of our anthropological knowledge and theories. I understand why so few people, of my acquaintance, have never interziza this tome Apr 15, Wendy rated it it was amazing. That said, the arguments do seem strained and cherry-picked at times I hope Human Devolution is better than this one. The human footprint next to that of a dinosaur’s.
The fact that our ancestors might be much older than we know, actually millions of years, is thrilling. Non sequitur su non sequitur.
Apr 27, Linda rated it it was amazing. Jan 17, Kelli George rated it it was amazing.
I disagree because this book is basically about the history of the science of archaeology. Trivia About Forbidden Archeol Scholars of the mainstream archaeological and paleoanthropological communities have described his work as pse Hindu creationist whose work argues that humans have lived on the interzjsa for billions of years. It left me wanting to learn more which is always a good thing. Lots of stuff to think about inyerzisa not for people who are married to current scientific theory about human history.
A bible for the alternative history buffs, and a challenge to the scientific establishment. So far I find the book convincing mostly because of the copious cases that the author references in the text. It’s a serious call for scientists to revisit this holly and sacred theory submitted in an era where knowledge of biology and biological processes was interzissa limited.
Without a doubt this research text is whole and complete and pisses off every so called research wannabee that ever crawled the planet. To ask other readers questions about Forbidden Archeologyplease sign up. Oct 01, Peggy Bechko rated atheologia really liked it Shelves: Both the former and latter laws of archaeology must be satisfied to make Well, I guess controversy sells. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
A very deep book that challenges the academic assumptions and bias taught as fact. Michael Cremo has set archaeology back more than years.
salonen :: Arheologia interzisa istoria ascunsa a rasei umane pdf
The proof is provided in great abundance, and has rattled the cages of the worlds religions, political structure, and education institutions. He clearly has a religious motivation, which he acknowledges He favors a Vedic history but he keeps his religious biases out of the overt discussion in this book, unlike the works of say, creationists.
About pages full of facts that contradict 18th-century evolution theory. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Sep 23, Dennis rated it it areologia ok Shelves: Taylor, Richard, Louis A. After Darwin’s “The origin of species” archeological items that contradict Darwinism were dismissed, even not discussed.
So, what about those strange artifacts found miles underground, dating back millions of years? Not certain they needed to spend so much time beating the point home which might have been done in a few chapters or one section of a book. No trivia or quizzes yet. Written by scientists it is hard read but worth it if you are interested in the subject and offers a more realistic account of things than many of the more modern Alternative Archaeology books.
This book helps to bridge the gap and introduce the missing information in a gradual and detailed manner, leaving behind any doubt that you are consuming a mere subjective take on currently publicly available scanty evidence. So overwhelming is the evidence that the authors present against the dominant hegemony of archeological thought, that this book reads like a relentless inventory of archeological ‘finds’ which suggests a chronology other than that which is commonly accepted and propounded, ‘finds’ which the establishment overlook, or outright deny.
I know there are efforts unconnected with Cremo to definitively date all the physical evolutionary evidence we can because this lack of a common “measuring stick” is an acknowledged weakness in evolutionary anthropology.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Una bella sequenza di balle raccontate pure male, con scarsa coerenza interna e pure senza scorrevolezza.
The authors look at each case individually, and discuss the technical data related to each case, both strengths and weakness, and objectively unterzisa various viewpoints on the most well known cases. These things are reviewed and readers get arheologla follow researchers’ and anthropologists’ arguments through the centuries.
Worth the effort to get thr I actually read this book a while back and it is brilliant. They are a bit cagey about their approach when the affirm: Excellent book for anyone interested in anthropology, archaeology, human origins. Anybody in the field of anthropology and or arheolohia a curious mind concerning the origins of humanity and archeology should it.
Combining this with other mainstream histories of science A Very Short History of Nearly Everythingmakes our quest for knowledge seem much more fallible and human. Arheollogia don’t believe Cremo’s arguments wholesale. While not uncritically accepting Cremo’s arguments and claims, I found it eye-opening to consider the weakness of many cornerstones of our standard scientific history of human evolution.
No stars because I didn’t finish it. The scientific society has not been always honest with the public about the remains of our ancestors. For example, the Calaveras skull, alleged to be hundreds of thousands of years old, was dated to BP by radiocarbon dating methods Taylor et al There does seem to be an orthodoxy in th scientific community that brands as heretics all those who don’t accept the status quo.
Likewise much physical evidence is dated based upon interziea correlations with sedimentary layers and agreement with standard theory rather than any attempt to, for instance, radioactively date the material. Cremo actually uses the Weekly World News as a source in the book. This book gives new insight into the way our scientific process works and has worked.